What is Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs)
What is PMQs?
Prime Minister’s Questions, usually shortened to PMQs, is a half-hour session in the House of Commons every Wednesday at noon. During it, Members of Parliament (MPs) have the chance to ask the Prime Minister (PM) about government policy, pressing national issues, or sometimes even very local matters in their constituencies.
Although it is only thirty minutes long, PMQs is one of the most visible and dramatic fixtures in British politics. Television cameras, rolling news channels, and political journalists cover it extensively, and clips from particularly fiery exchanges often dominate headlines.
A Brief History
The tradition of questioning ministers is as old as Parliament itself, but for much of history it was informal and irregular. MPs could ask ministers questions on certain days, and prime ministers were not always singled out.
It was only in the mid-20th century that the idea of a dedicated time slot for the Prime Minister became fixed. In 1961, Prime Minister Harold Macmillan agreed to two short weekly sessions of questions. These were later merged into the current single 30-minute slot on Wednesdays during Tony Blair’s premiership in 1997.
Since then, PMQs has become a ritual — sometimes celebrated as a symbol of accountability, sometimes criticised as a rowdy spectacle.
How PMQs Works Today
The format of PMQs is set out in parliamentary procedure:
Opening Questions – The session usually begins with a “closed question” such as “If the Prime Minister will list his engagements for the day”. This stock phrase allows MPs to follow up with supplementary questions on any topic.
Backbench MPs – MPs from all parties may then ask questions, chosen in advance by ballot. These might focus on constituency concerns, national issues, or party priorities.
Leader of the Opposition – The most high-profile part of PMQs. The Leader of the Opposition (currently Keir Starmer) gets six questions in a row, designed to test the Prime Minister and put the government under pressure.
Third-largest party – Traditionally the leader of the Liberal Democrats, or another significant party, gets two questions.
Other MPs – Additional MPs can ask questions, but time is limited.
The Speaker of the House of Commons presides over the session, calling MPs to speak and maintaining order. Without the Speaker’s authority, PMQs would descend into chaos.
The Atmosphere
If you’ve ever seen clips of PMQs, you’ll notice it’s unlike most parliamentary debates. The chamber is packed, MPs shout support or derision, and exchanges can be theatrical. The Commons chamber itself is small and adversarial by design: government MPs sit on one side, opposition MPs directly opposite, at a distance said to be “two sword-lengths” apart.
Critics call PMQs a “bear pit” or “political theatre.” Supporters argue that the combative tone is part of democratic accountability — forcing the Prime Minister to defend policies under hostile questioning, live on television.
Why PMQs Matters
For politicians, journalists, and attentive citizens, PMQs is important for several reasons:
Accountability – The Prime Minister must stand in front of MPs and answer unscripted questions. Even if answers are evasive, the act of questioning highlights pressure points.
Testing Leaders – PMQs is seen as a test of a Prime Minister’s ability to think on their feet. A weak performance can damage credibility; a strong one can rally supporters.
Setting the Agenda – Journalists often use PMQs as a snapshot of what issues are dominating politics that week — from taxes and the economy to foreign crises or scandals.
Party Morale – Cheering from the backbenches (and jeering from the other side) can boost or deflate morale within parties.
Public Perception – Many voters encounter politics through PMQs highlights. A memorable zinger or embarrassing stumble can shape public opinion far beyond Westminster.
Criticism of PMQs
Despite its symbolic role, PMQs has faced criticism:
Soundbites over substance – Answers are often evasive or rehearsed, designed for media clips rather than detailed scrutiny.
Rowdy behaviour – Shouting, jeering, and partisan theatre can alienate the public, who may see it as childish rather than serious.
Focus on leaders – Opposition leaders dominate the session, leaving limited time for ordinary MPs to raise constituency concerns.
Limited accountability – Some argue that select committees and longer debates hold ministers to account more effectively than the weekly half-hour confrontation.
Reformers have occasionally suggested changes, such as longer sessions, stricter rules of decorum, or even shifting to a less confrontational format. So far, tradition has prevailed.
Famous PMQs Moments
PMQs has produced countless memorable moments:
Margaret Thatcher sparring with Neil Kinnock in the 1980s, often skewering her opponents with sharp retorts.
Tony Blair facing William Hague, who was regarded as witty but ultimately unable to land lasting blows.
David Cameron mocking Ed Miliband with the line “Weak, weak, weak”.
Theresa May struggling through Brexit-dominated sessions, often accused of dodging questions.
Boris Johnson facing intense questioning over “Partygate” and pandemic decisions.
These exchanges often shape public impressions of leaders’ competence and authority.
How Citizens Can Use PMQs
For the average person trying to follow political news, PMQs offers a few practical benefits:
Quick Political Weather Report – Watching or reading about PMQs shows what issues are top of mind in Westminster.
Judging Leaders – You can see how the Prime Minister and opposition leaders handle pressure, which reveals their strengths and weaknesses.
Understanding Political Framing – Both sides use PMQs to frame the narrative: government emphasises achievements; opposition highlights failures.
Spotting Partisanship – PMQs shows party discipline in action — MPs cheer their side, jeer the other.
Related Concepts to Know
To fully grasp PMQs coverage, it helps to also understand:
Speaker of the House of Commons – the referee who maintains order.
Frontbench vs Backbench – ministers and shadow ministers (front) vs ordinary MPs (back).
Manifesto pledges – promises MPs often press the PM to keep.
Select Committees – longer, less theatrical forms of scrutiny.
Conclusion
PMQs is both spectacle and scrutiny. It may not always deliver detailed answers, but it does showcase the clash of ideas, the accountability of leaders, and the drama of parliamentary democracy. For citizens, learning how to read between the jeers and soundbites helps turn PMQs from confusing noise into a valuable insight into how Britain is governed.
UK Political Literacy
for Beginners
Don’t know where to start with politics?
This friendly, step-by-step course helps you cut through the noise and understand how UK politics really works.
- 20+ bite-sized lessons
- No jargon, beginner-friendly
- Learn rights, voting & media literacy
- Lifetime access
